University of Arizona, Chemistry 103b, Walter Miller
Among other things this semester we will approach the two basic questions concerning chemical reactions:
examples
C(diamond)
C(graphite)
G0 = -2.3 kJ
H2(g) + 1/2 O2(g)
H2O(l)
G0 = -237 kJ
This is related to the general problem of
"statics" versus "dynamics"
"equilibrium" versus "kinetics"
and involved with the problem of
"macroscopic" versus "microscopic"
aA + bB
cC + dD
Discuss "synthetic" experimental data for: F2 + 2 NO2
2 NO2F
This suggests:
Rate = -(1/a)(
[A]/
t) = -(1/b)(
[B]/
t) = (1/c)(
[C]/
t) = (1/d)(
[D]/
t)
This assumes that the stoichiometry is known and that no stoichiometrically significant intermediates are formed. Also, not everyone reports their data in this manner.
The data also suggests:
Rate = k[A]^
[B]^
[X]^
[Y]^
This is an example of a rate law, with k being the (specific) rate constant and
is the order with respect to A,
is the order with respect to B, etc and the overall order is the sum of the individual orders. If your analysis is complete, k should depend only on T.
Develop a vocabulary of resultlets: A
products
In the following, if you don't like calculus, interpret "d" as
.
-d[A]/dt = k[A]0 = k
d[A] = -kdt
[A] - [A]0 = -k(t - t0)
let t0 = 0
[A] = [A]0 - kt
-d[A]/dt = k[A]1 = k[A]
d[A]/[A] = -kdtln ([A]/[A]0) = -kt
[A] = [A]0e-kt
-d[A]/dt = k[A]2
d[A]/[A]2 = -kdt
-1/[A] + 1/[A]0 = -kt
More complicated cases (thousands) have been dealt with in the literature.
Examples:
More resultlets: A
products
[A]0/2 = [A]0 - kt1/2
t1/2 = [A]0/2k
ln ([A]0/2[A]0) = -kt1/2
t1/2 = (ln 2)/k (note independent of [A]0)
-2/[A]0 + 1/[A]0 = -kt1/2
t1/2 = 1/k[A]0
ln ([A]/[A]0) = -kt = -(ln 2)(t/t1/2)
[A]/[A]0 = (e-ln 2)(t/t1/2) = (1/2)t/t1/2
Work example.
Usually falls out during the analysis of the rate law.
When a rate law is fully analyzed, the specific rate constant should only depend on the temperature. The tradition is to analyze the temperature dependence using the Arrhenius equation:
k = Ae-Ea/RT
This is most easily done by measuring the specific rate constant at several temperatures and plotting ln k versus 1/T and the slope of the resulting straight line (hopefully) will be -Ea/R.If you have only two temperature measurements, you can also do this algebraically.
Although the activation energy is usually measured on the macroscopic scale it is often interpreted on the microscopic scale. In particular, it is popular to sketch "energy" versus "reaction coordinate".
This is the microscopic description of the chemical reaction. In general, one postulates a set of elementary steps which, when analyzed, gives you the observed rate law. There may be several mechanisms that superficially appear adequate to describe a single reaction. It is very important to separate in your mind the macroscopic analysis of rate data that we have been doing from the microscopic description that we are about to start. Confusing these issues is probably the most common mistake made by chemistry professionals.
When discussing elementary steps the term "molecularity" often replaces the term "order" in the language. This helps to remind people that this analysis is taking place at the microscopic scale and not the macroscopic scale.
1st order becomes unimolecular
2nd order becomes bimolecular (common)
3rd order becomes termolecular (rare)
If there are no parallel steps, summing the individual elementary steps should give you the balanced equation.
Properly analyzed, the mechanism should give you the observed rate law.
Easy.
Find the slow, "rate determining" step.
Use whatever tools are necessary (maybe none) to eliminate the concentration of any species that cannot be controlled (for instance, an intermediate) from the rate law.
The primary tool that we have available is equilibrium. This severely limits the number of mechanisms that we can analyze.
For a good discussion of the SN2 reaction including a detailed graph of energy versus reaction coordinate and a movie go to SN2
Last updated: 24 August 1999
Please contact Walter Miller at millerw@u.arizona.edu with problems and comments.